作恶是你们,假扮救世主又是你们,你们真是奸恶。
“黑警还眼”
黑警还眼

很显然,邪恶方(很可能是putin)在几个月前非法入侵我的手机!(我可以分析症状)呼吁正义方的我的支持者们也入侵我的手机把 Putin 的恶意骇客程序踢出并留证据准备起诉!
呼吁!
加拿大最高法院的丑陋嘴脸:5. 公然践踏圣经, “上帝至上” 明确写在加拿大宪法中、反宪法的本质! 👉“Canada’s Supreme Court Rules Against the Bible” “ if a Christian law school wants accreditation, it must abandon biblical values. ” (2018.6.16)荒唐地不可理喻!
Canada’s Supreme Court Rules Against the Bible
加拿大最高法院的丑陋嘴脸:政治化、为假女王服务! 4. “ SUPREME Court of Canada = Corrupt politician institution that makes political judgment to 👉maintain (FAKE)“Queen” SZUL👈”, “ Corrupt Canadian Judges are Real Shame for he World”.
Corrupt Canadian Judges are Real Shame for he World
加拿大最高法院的丑陋嘴脸: 3. “SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CORRUPT TO THE CORE.” – 这使我想起、全世界见证着的这超级疯狂和罪恶,你们居然向我这宗教领袖要证据?!
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CORRUPT TO THE CORE. – YouTube
British Columbia. There have been corrupt judges who take bribes & fix cases (贪脏枉法!). They are often caught, prosecuted, and put in jail. In Canada, there have been corrupt judges and they are often exposed by their victims but there are no recorded cases of a judge being prosecuted for corruption on the bench in Canada .
Canadian Legal and Judicial Corruption – Water War Crimes
📢军人们你们不必要担忧!📢会有足够的资金提供给你们、帮助你们起诉恶法官和这不正义的系统、帮助你们摆脱奴隶的处境、帮助你们讨要公平、正义和所有的正当权利! 📢呼吁你们争做英雄、 自助助人、贡献社会!
会有足够的资金提供给你们。
请你们做英雄、 自助助人!
📢加拿大最高法院的丑陋嘴脸,呼吁国际舆论强烈谴责和抗议: 2. 这近期出现的加拿大军队中的 性骚扰案,同样【高度涉嫌是 deep state 蓄意发动的对于军队/军人的威胁恐吓打击报复、以此阻碍加拿大军队参与我的救援维护正义!】呼吁国际舆论强烈谴责和抗议! 👉 👉“ $900-million deal reached in class actions on sexual misconduct in military. ”


The federal government promised $900 million in compensation Thursday to settle multiple class-action lawsuits lodged on behalf of survivors of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and sexual assault in the military.
The settlement provides $800 million for members of the Canadian Armed Forces and $100 million in compensation for another class of employees of the Department of National Defence.
Over the past few years, participants in several lawsuits alleging similar misconduct and systemic problems in the military agreed to co-operate in their legal actions against the government.
One claim, filed by three former members of the military, said the Armed Forces was “poisoned by a discriminatory and sexualized culture” that encouraged sexual misconduct and was caused by a failure in leadership.
Amy Graham, a primary plaintiff in that case, said the settlement was not just about monetary compensation, and she was most excited for policy changes included in the agreement. Graham was assaulted by a superior while returning from a deployment in Afghanistan.
One of the most exciting things, she said, is a “restorative engagement” program where victims could share their experiences with military leadership.
From there, Graham said, “we can go about getting some real change to decrease the amount of victims.”
Reducing the number of victims was the main motivation behind the suit in the first place, Graham said. The problem continues, she noted, citing a recent survey from Statistics Canada that showed little improvement in the rates of sexual misconduct in the military.
Another positive aspect of the settlement was that it could help provide closure for people who were never able to come forward or have their cases investigated, Graham said.
“I’m hoping they can move forward and start the healing process.”
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told media in Victoria Thursday that the government moved to settle because it takes sexual misconduct extremely seriously and no one should feel unsafe in their place of work.
“That’s why we have moved forward on changing approaches, on responding to past wrongs and working with survivors of sexual assault and abuse to try and make sure that we end this process, that we change our mindsets in workplace, but we also recognize the damage and trauma that has been done.”
In a statement Thursday, deputy defence minister Jody Thomas and the military’s top general Jonathan Vance said they acknowledged the “obligation to ensure a safe work environment for all women and men” in the military.
“We hope that the settlement will help bring closure, healing, and acknowledgment to the victims and survivors of sexual assault, harassment, and discrimination,” the statement said.
The settlement notes that the government is not admitting liability.
The government had sought to defend itself in court against the lawsuits, filing documents in December 2017 in an attempt to quash them.
But after facing criticism, the government moved to begin settlement proceedings in early 2018.
Class members will mostly be eligible for between $5,000 and $55,000, with higher compensation for people who were subjected to exceptional harm and were denied disability benefits related to that harm. Those members could receive up to $155,000.
The specifics of the payout will depend on the size of the class in the case — the number of people who come forward saying they were the subject of sexual harassment, gender discrimination or sexual assault.
The settlement also calls for an external review of existing anti-harassment programs and revisions to how the government deals with disability benefits for survivors of sexual assault or harassment.
While Graham is hopeful about the policy changes included in the settlement, she said changing the culture of the military will not come easily.
“It’s been entrenched, ingrained in the military for so long — decades — that it’s not going to be a quick fix,” she said.
Throughout our largest public park are many cannons, statues of soldiers killed in wars, memorial plaques. The soldiers were almost all teenagers who were compelled to join the army and the wars were generally, but not always, about (preserving) British world privilege. If after the revelations of horrific sexual attacks in the military to the tune of nearly $900 million reparations to victims I hope not to see see one more monument rising. If one does, may it commemorate the huge number of sexual assault victims of classic military culture.
The military is a representative cross section of people in any society. Even before women were employed by the military, the congregation of large numbers of men in what we now call “man camps” was always a hazard for women – and sometimes other men. No matter how you parse it, men – expecially in concentrated groups – are simply a combustible mix, bound at some point to explode in systemic misconduct and violence. The military model is universally a hazard, not just to a society’s enemies, but to itself.
Comments